Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Ritchie v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv04216
Defendant:
George Lombardi, Pamala Swartz, Thomas Pryor and others
Plaintiff:
John Ritchie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Brady et al
as 1:2019cv00110
Defendant:
Hearington, Culclager, Leuis and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa R Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Payne et al
as 1:2018cv00082
Defendant:
Hearington, Foster, Allbritton and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa R Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Hutchinson et al
as 1:2018cv00070
Defendant:
Hearington, Jane Doe, Pamala Malotte and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Ryan Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kingston DA GOD f/k/a JC Bryant v. Corizon Medical Services et al
as 2:2016cv04314
Plaintiff:
Universal-Unison A Kingston DA GOD f/k/a JC Bryant
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services, Krystal Houston, Pamala Swartz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guest v. Laramore et al
as 2:2016cv04254
Plaintiff:
Antwon Guest
Defendant:
Wanda Laramore, Corizon Corporation, Krystal Houston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Meloy et al
as 4:2015cv00634
Defendant:
Ronald E. Meloy, Pamala K. Meloy, James A. Meloy and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
James Bennett v. Richard Miles, et al
as 14-2124
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Bennett
Defendant - Appellee:
Richard H. Miles, President, CMS, Sally Powers, Vice President, CMS, Leon Vickers, Health Administrator and others
Michael Benjamin v. Ray Hobbs, et al
as 14-1513
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Benjamin
Defendant - Appellee:
Ray Hobbs, A.D.C. Director, William Straughn, Warden, Maurice Williams, Major and others
Benjamin v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2013cv00319
Plaintiff:
Michael Benjamin
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, William Straughn, Maurice Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
