Cases 1 - 10 of 1,704
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv05082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12201 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Tukacyungurwa et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02851
Plaintiff:
Devis Rauben Tukacyungurwa, Willy Serumaga, Richards Ndaula and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Ssekasamba et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02849
Plaintiff:
Kizito Ssekasamba, Rwabusheija Austin Mujuni, Samuel Ssenyonga and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Abrego et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv02818
Plaintiff:
Joseph Abrego, Antonio Aguilar, Jose R Aguilera and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Nakakande et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02798
Plaintiff:
Sarah Nakakande, Salome Nakayiza, Damascus Nakhaima and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Ackerman et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv02686
Plaintiff:
Alexander Ackerman, Jorge Ibrain Adrian, Jose Dimas Alfaro and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Estate of Ann Boggess et al v. U.S. Bank, N.A. et al
as 0:2023cv00045
Plaintiff:
Estate of Ann Boggess, Estate of Frank Bolle, Estate of Lena Longo and others
Defendant:
U.S. Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Saul Aguilar-Sanchez v. Merrick Garland
as 22-3598
Petitioner:
Saul Aguilar-Sanchez
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Leiva v. Douglas County Corrections
as 8:2022cv00242
Petitioner:
Saul Ernesto Leiva
Respondent:
Douglas County Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
