Cases 1 - 10 of 22
State of Kansas, et al v. Dorothy Fink, et al
as 25-1097
Plaintiff:
State of Kansas, State of South Carolina, State of Iowa and others
Defendant:
Dorothy Fink, in her official capacity of as Acting Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and others
State of Kansas et al v. Becerra et al
as 1:2024cv00110
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Plaintiff:
State of Kansas, State of Utah, Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Amicus Curiae:
Michigan Elder Justice Initiative, National Consumer Voice for Quality Long-Term Care, Center for Medicare Advocacy and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
State of Tennessee, et al v. EEOC
as 24-2249
Appellant:
The Ethics & Public Policy Center
Plaintiff:
State of Nebraska, State of Indiana, State of Alabama and others
Defendant:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
State of Iowa et al v. Council on Environmental Quality et al
as 1:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
State of Louisiana, State of Utah, State of North Dakota and others
Defendant:
Brenda Mallory and Council on Environmental Quality
Petitioner:
Center for Biological Diversity, Alaska Community Action on Toxics, Center for Environmental Health and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Ruthie Walls, et al v. Jacob Oliva, et al
as 24-1990
Plaintiff:
Ruthie Walls, Jennifer Reynolds, as next friend of Sadie Annabella Reynolds, Chandra Williams Davis, as Next Friend of Giselle Davis and others
Defendant:
Sarah Sanders, in her official capacity as Governor of the State of Arkansas, Jacob Oliva, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Arkansas Department of Education, and individually, Sarah Moore, in her official capacity as Member of the Arkansas State Board of Education and others
Appellant:
State of Iowa, State of Florida, State of Idaho and others
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 24-2225
Petitioner:
State of West Virginia, State of Georgia, State of Arkansas and others
Respondent:
United States Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
State of West Virginia, et al v. SEC
as 24-1634
Petitioner:
State of West Virginia, State of Georgia, State of Alabama and others
Respondent:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, Inc., et al v. Merrick B. Garland, et al
as 23-3230
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, Inc., State of West Virginia, State of North Dakota and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Merrick B. Garland, in his Official Capacity, as Attorney General of the United States, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, The and Steven Dettelbach, in his Official Capacity, as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
Appellant:
Members of Congress
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 23-2411
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of West Virginia, State of North Dakota, State of Georgia and others
Not Yet Classified:
American Farm Bureau Federation, American Petroleum Institute, American Road and Transportation Builders Association and others
Defendant / Appellant:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Michael S. Regan, In His Official Capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and others
Intervenor:
Chickaloon Village Traditional Council, Rappahannock Tribe, Tohono O'Odham Nation and others
Randall Beasley v. WV State Trooper Lowe, et al
as 23-2382
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Randall Jay Beasley, a Sovereign, a Citizen of one of the Several States, et al
Defendant / Appellee:
West Virginia State Trooper Lowe, West Virginia State Trooper Jan Cahill, Superintendent, Colonel for the state of West Virginia and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
