Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Brooks v. Arkansas Division of Correction et al
as 6:2024cv06020
Plaintiff:
Dale Roslyn Brooks
Defendant:
Arkansas Division of Correction, Arkansas, State of, D Earl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Arkansas Division of Correction et al
as 4:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Dale Roslyn Brooks
Defendant:
Arkansas Division of Correction, Arkansas, State of, D Earl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
DeLarron Keith Washington
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Jimmy Coleman, IV, Janice Blake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Ball et al
as 6:2021cv06157
Plaintiff:
Jay Lloyd Harris
Defendant:
Deputy Warden Richard T. Ball, Director Dexter Payne, Dr. Guy M. Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Ball et al
as 6:2021cv06118
Plaintiff:
Jay Lloyd Harris
Defendant:
Deputy Warden Richard T. Ball, Director Dexter Payne and Dr. Guy M. Henry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Anderson v. Wendy Kelley, et al
as 21-2669
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael L. Anderson
Defendant / Appellee:
Wendy Kelley, Former Director, Dexter Payne, Director, ADC, William Straughn, Deputy Director, ADC and others
Green v. Smith et al
as 5:2019cv00289
Defendant:
Russell, D Payne, Naylor and others
Plaintiff:
Rickie Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morningstar v. Kelley et al
as 4:2019cv00212
Defendant:
Willis, Wendy Kelley, Dale Reed and others
Plaintiff:
Khanis-Orion Morningstar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hobbs v. Kelley et al
as 5:2018cv00198
Defendant:
A Culclager, Richard T Ball and Wendy Kelley
Plaintiff:
Jeramye Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ball, Sr. v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2018cv02016
Plaintiff:
John T. Ball, Sr.
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
