Cases 1 - 10 of 901
Witham v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01866
Plaintiff:
Teresa Witham
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Randy Rindahl v. Tim Reisch, et al
as 24-2033
Plaintiff:
Randy Rindahl
Defendant:
Kimberley Malsam-Rysdon, Ex-Secretary of Health, Joan Adam, Interim Secretary of Health, Kristi Noem, Governor for the State of South Dakota and others
Rabenberg v. South Dakota Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 4:2024cv04088
Petitioner:
Curtis Ronald Rabenberg
Respondent:
South Dakota Board of Pardons and Paroles, Teresa Bittinger and The Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01629
Plaintiff:
Teresa Allen
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Will LaClaire v. Teresa Bittinger, et al
as 24-1925
Plaintiff:
Will C. LaClaire
Defendant:
Teresa L. Bittinger and Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Schuhwerk et al v. Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois
as 4:2024cv00587
Plaintiff:
Teresa Schuhwerk and Marylin Brenk
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Gallop v. Segal
as 0:2024cv01357
Petitioner:
Teresa Gallop
Respondent:
Michael Segal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smidt et al v. Deere & Company
as 4:2024cv04072
Plaintiff:
Teresa Smidt and Brad Smidt
Defendant:
Deere & Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rogers v. State of South Dakota et al
as 4:2024cv04071
Petitioner:
James Rogers
Respondent:
State of South Dakota, Kellie Wasko and Teresa Bittinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bell v. Tjeerdsma et al
as 4:2024cv04068
Plaintiff:
Shane Douglas Bell
Defendant:
Kelly Tjeerdsma, Brian Foley, Kelly Wasko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
