Cases 11 - 20 of 84
Camacho et al v. PeopleConnect, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00209
Plaintiff:
Jose Medina Camacho and Rhonda Cotta
Defendant:
PeopleConnect, Inc., Intelius LLC and The Control Group Media Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Camacho et al v. The Control Group Media Company, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv01957
Plaintiff:
Jose Medina Camacho and Rhonda Cotta
Defendant:
The Control Group Media Company, LLC and Truthfinder, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lp
Medina Camacho et al v. The Control Group Media Company, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv01954
Plaintiff:
Jose Medina Camacho and Rhonda Cotta
Defendant:
The Control Group Media Company, LLC and Instant Checkmate, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lp
Allen Medina v. Kijakazi
as 3:2021cv01872
Plaintiff:
Deborah Gay Allen Medina
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 id
Cavazos v. Garilaso et al
as 3:2021cv01156
Defendant:
Mr. Rogers, J Marquez, Mr. Garilaso and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Cavazos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Kuhn v. Saul
as 3:2021cv00472
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Medina Kuhn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 id
Nguyen et al v. Becerra et al
as 3:2020cv02470
Plaintiff:
Darin Prince, Dominic Boguski, Firearms Policy Coalition, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra and Luis Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Medina v. County of San Diego et al
as 3:2020cv02046
Defendant:
Tyson J. Kresher, Aaron J. Anderson, William D. Gore and others
Plaintiff:
Raymundo Medina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01912
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Western Alliance Bank v. Medina et al
as 3:2020cv01166
Defendant:
Gerald D. Medina and Jessica Medina
Plaintiff:
Western Alliance Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.