Cases 141 - 150 of 837,886
Blaine v. Odum
as 1:2024cv03693
Petitioner:
Michael Blaine
Respondent:
Roy Odum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv07473
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Berry v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co et al
as 3:2024cv01133
Defendant:
Selman & Co L L C of Ohio, Nutrien U S L L C and Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co
Plaintiff:
Pattie Berry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Buhl v. Doe et al
as 2:2024cv12192
Defendant:
Linda S. Hallmark and John Doe
Plaintiff:
John Buhl
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
THE PLASTIC SURGERY CENTER, P.A. v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 1:2024cv08593
Defendant:
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and XYZ CORP. 1-10
Plaintiff:
THE PLASTIC SURGERY CENTER, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal--Other Contract
THE PLASTIC SURGERY CENTER, P.A. v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 1:2024cv08591
Defendant:
XYZ CORPS. 1-10 and AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
THE PLASTIC SURGERY CENTER, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal--Other Contract
BLUE FOUNDRY BANK v. ARSENIS et al
as 3:2024cv08585
Plaintiff:
BOILING SPRINGS SAVINGS BANK and BLUE FOUNDRY BANK
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK NA, THOMAS S. PETERS, CHRYSSOULA ARSENIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Notice of Removal- Foreclosure
VEGA v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv08599
Respondent:
R. THOMPSON
Petitioner:
MICHAEL VEGA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HADJIEV v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv08601
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON
Petitioner:
DIMITRE HADJIEV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
