Cases 91 - 100 of 827,954
Kelley v. Truck Insurance Exchange
as 0:2024cv60888
Plaintiff:
William Kelley and Marion Kelley
Defendant:
Truck Insurance Exchange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Caplan v. Hyper Deals Auto Sales, Corp. et al
as 0:2024cv60890
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant:
Hyper Deals Auto Sales, Corp. and Pelican Bays Ground Lessor, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Weissman Cabezas v. Facility Contract Services LLC
as 0:2024cv60885
Plaintiff:
Mindi Weissman Cabezas
Defendant:
Facility Contract Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01974
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
(PC) Bonilla v. Calaveras County Court Clerk's Office Employees
as 2:2024cv01352
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rubin Development and Construction, Inc. v. Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company et al
as 1:2024cv03666
Plaintiff:
Rubin Development and Construction, Inc.
Defendant:
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company, James River Insurance Company and AXIS Surplus Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1536
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5502
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
NACCO Natural Resources Corporation v. EPA, et al
as 24-1154
Petitioner:
NACCO Natural Resources Corporation
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
