Cases 41 - 50 of 317
IN RE SUBPOENAS ISSUED TO JEFFREY WILLIAMS AND BRUCE WATROUS JR.
as 3:2023cv01475
Plaintiff:
Sjunde AP-Fonden and Metzler Asset Management GmbH
Defendant:
Qualcomm Incorporated
Petitioner:
Apple, Inc., Jeffrey Williams and Bruce Watrous, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
In re DMCA Subpoena to Apple Inc. et al v. Apple Inc.
as 5:2023mc80200
Plaintiff:
In re DMCA Subpoena to Apple Inc. and KADOKAWA CORPORATION
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Margolis et al v. Apple Inc.
as 5:2023cv03882
Plaintiff:
Dr. Fern Margolis, Mayer Margolis, Juan Padilla and others
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
IN RE SUBPOENAS ISSUED TO JEFFREY WILLIAMS AND BRUCE WATROUS JR.
as 5:2023mc80181
Petitioner:
Apple Inc., Jeffrey Williams and Bruce Watrous, Jr.
Not Classified By Court:
Sjunde AP-Fonden, Metzler Asset Management GMBH and Qualcomm Incorporated
Byrd v. Apple Inc.
as 5:2023cv02809
Plaintiff:
Austin W. Byrd
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hughes et al v. Apple, Inc.
as 3:2022cv07668
Plaintiff:
Lauren Hughes and Jane Doe
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Floyd v. Amazon.com Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01599
Plaintiff:
Steven Floyd
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc., Apple Inc., Amazon.com Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Grimsley et al v. Nike Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01574
Defendant:
Inmate Calling Solutions, Valley Family Health Care, Citizens United for the Rehabilitation of Errants and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Alexander Grimsley, Leonardo Rafael Urquijo Arvizu, Steven Tyler Premo and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
SaurikIT, LLC v. Apple, Inc.
as 22-16527
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAURIKIT, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
APPLE, INC.
Hadona Diep, et al v. Apple, Inc.
as 22-16514
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HADONA DIEP and RYUMEI NAGAO
Defendant / Appellee:
APPLE, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
