Cases 21 - 30 of 112
Taylor Matthew Scott v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv04902
Plaintiff:
Taylor Matthew Scott
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, Officer Torres, Jane Doe No. 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jason Harmon v. Lewandowski, et al
as 22-55396
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON HARMON
Defendant / Appellee:
LEWANDOWSKI, BRIDGEFORTH and ROSALES
Defendant:
VAUGHN, PEREZ, GAFFNEY and others
(PC) Barker v. Goat et al
as 2:2022cv00649
Plaintiff:
William Barker
Defendant:
Goat, Jane Does 1-5, CDCR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powell v. City of Seattle et al
as 2:2022cv00423
Plaintiff:
Jerome Lenorda Powell, II
Defendant:
City of Seattle, Seattle Police Department and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daugherty v. Patton et al
as 2:2021cv01723
Plaintiff:
Kevin Daugherty
Defendant:
Dr. Mark Patton, TLC Board, Dr. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lima-Flores v. Underhill et al
as 2:2021cv01141
Plaintiff:
Santos A. Lima-Flores
Defendant:
Mr. Underhill, Mr. E. Shaw, Dorothy Wettlaufer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shields v. Blewett et al
as 2:2021cv01001
Plaintiff:
Paul Kay Shields
Defendant:
Tyler Blewett, Ms. Elmore, FNU K. Ramsay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Grey et al
as 2:2021cv00095
Defendant:
Laurance Harrod, Michael Wright, Douglas McLane and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jay Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jason Harmon v. Lewandowski et al
as 2:2020cv09437
Defendant:
Does 1-5, Perez, Gaffney and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Harmon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marble v. Missoula County et al
as 9:2020cv00089
Defendant:
Michael Dominick, Missoula County Attorney's Office, Brad Giffin and others
Plaintiff:
Cody Marble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
