Cases 21 - 30 of 827,828
Shadek v. Kidd
as 6:2024cv00950
Plaintiff:
James M Shadek
Defendant:
Tamara S Kidd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Fifth Third Bank, N.A. v. Randall Construction Holdings, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00960
Plaintiff:
Fifth Third Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
RANDALL CONSTRUCTION HOLDINGS, INC., Randall Mechanical, Inc., 3207 Clarcona, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Sanchez v. A & J Ready Mix Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00476
Plaintiff:
Francisco Sanchez
Defendant:
A & J Ready Mix Inc. and Juan J. Bentancor
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Jermine v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 3:2024cv00922
Plaintiff:
Corrine Jermine
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lovings v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2024cv01955
Plaintiff:
Iran Bernard Lovings
Defendant:
Harris County Jail S Ed Gonzalez, R Savage and Mr. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Orange County of Florida et al
as 6:2024cv00958
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
Defendant:
Orange County of Florida and State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00956
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Logan v. Newell Brands Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
JOHNETTA LOGAN
Defendant:
NEWELL BRANDS INC., GRACO CHILDREN'S PRODUCTS INC. and DEJON WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024bk42163
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Us Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Calysta M Miller
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
