Cases 1 - 10 of 152
(PS) Jacobs et al v. The Trustees of Princeton University et al
as 2:2024cv01143
Plaintiff:
Joel Brendon Jacobs and Kathleen Chambers
Defendant:
The Trustees of Princeton University, Princeton University Investment Co., Christopher Eisgruber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO) Act
Smith v. Novoa et al
as 1:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Candace Smith
Defendant:
Dannette Novoa, Triple A Insurance and The City of Clovis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Lunch Inc v. Redhouse Virtual Education LLC et al
as 2:2023cv07607
Defendant:
Anthony Lynn Scallion, Trisstar L Scallion, Redhouse Virtual Education LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Lunch Inc
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
De La Cruz v. Maurer et al
as 2:2023cv00252
Plaintiff:
Roman S De La Cruz
Defendant:
Aimee Maurer, Patrick Johnson, Jeffrey R Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Gold v. US Bancorp et al
as 3:2023cv01342
Plaintiff:
Michelle Gold, The Gold Family Trust, Star Martinez and others
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, RBS Acceptance Inc., RBS Financial Prodcuts Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Navajo Health Foundation - Sage Memorial Hospital Incorporated v. Razaghi Development Company, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv08072
Plaintiff:
Navajo Health Foundation-Sage Memorial Hospital Incorporated doing business as Sage Memorial Hospital and Navajo Health Foundation-Sage Memorial Hospital Incorporated an Arizona non-profit corporation doing business as Sage Memorial Hospital
Defendant:
Razaghi Development Company LLC doing business as Razaghi Healthcare and Unknown Parties
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Ahmad R Razaghi, Tausif Hasan and Razaghi Development Company LLC
3Rd Party Defendant:
Netrisha Dalgai, Christi El-Meligi, Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP and others
Counter Defendant:
Navajo Health Foundation-Sage Memorial Hospital Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Christensen et al v. United Automobile Insurance Company et al
as 2:2022cv02125
Plaintiff:
Thomas Christensen, E. Breen Arntz and Gary Lewis
Defendant:
United Automobile Insurance Company, Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie, Daniel Polsenberg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kathleen Wilkinson, et al v. Facebook, Inc.
as 22-16889
Not Classified By Court:
In re: FACEBOOK SIMULATED CASINO-STYLE GAMES LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KATHLEEN WILKINSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, NANCY URBANCZYK, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, LAURA PERKINSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
FACEBOOK, INC., a Delaware corporation
Amicus Curiae:
COMPUTER & COMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, SOFTWARE & INFORMATION INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION and others
In re: Kathleen Wilkinson, et al v. Facebook, Inc.
as 22-16888
Not Classified By Court:
In re: FACEBOOK SIMULATED CASINO-STYLE GAMES LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KATHLEEN WILKINSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, NANCY URBANCZYK, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, LAURA PERKINSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellant:
FACEBOOK, INC., a Delaware corporation
Amicus Curiae:
COMPUTER & COMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, SOFTWARE & INFORMATION INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION and others
Beauregard Parish Police Jury et al v. McKinsey Holdings, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv07278
Plaintiff:
Beauregard Parish Police Jury, Bossier Parish, Caddo Parish and others
Defendant:
McKinsey Holdings, Inc., McKinsey & Company, Inc. United States, McKinsey & Company, Inc. Washington D.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
