General Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 131 - 140 of 94,837
Oseguera v. Corpus
as 3:2024cv02000
Petitioner: Daniel Oseguera
Respondent: Christina Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ziegler v. Bennett We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv05381
Petitioner: Jeffrey Scott Ziegler
Respondent: Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hildebrand v. Campbell
as 5:2024cv01791
Petitioner: Michael Hildebrand
Respondent: Trisha Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Borla
as 5:2024cv02878
Petitioner: Cameron Williams
Respondent: Edward Borla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Andrewjeski
as 2:2024cv00162
Petitioner: Charles Allen Moore, Jr
Respondent: Melissa Andrewjeski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Hatchett v. Clark We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv01390
Petitioner: Cecil Jerome Hatchett
Respondent: Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yuste v. State of Montana We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00050
Petitioner: Elias Yuste
Respondent: State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Torrez v. Lundy
as 1:2024cv00362
Petitioner: Julio Angel Torrez, Jr.
Respondent: L. Lundy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Coker v. Cambell
as 1:2024cv00566
Petitioner: Charles David Coker
Respondent: T. Cambell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Riley v. Prudhle
as 2:2024cv01363
Petitioner: Rico Lyntice Riley
Respondent: Prudhle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?