Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Bonilla v. Calaveras County et al
as 2:2018cv00258
Petitioner:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Respondent:
Calaveras County, T. S. Healy and Grant V. Barrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fadden v. Vasquez
as 1:2017cv00398
Petitioner:
Barrett Juston Fadden
Respondent:
Pat L. Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nevins v. Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision
as 2:2016cv01050
Petitioner:
Barrett Lee Nevins
Respondent:
Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barrett v. Zaragoza et al
as 2:2015cv02541
Petitioner:
Jack O'Neal Barrett
Respondent:
Unknown Zaragoza and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barrett v. Legrand et al
as 3:2014cv00678
Petitioner:
Kenneth Don Barrett
Respondent:
Warden Legrand and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jacob Barrett v. Randy Workman
as 12-35945
Petitioner - Appellant:
JACOB BARRETT
Respondent - Appellee:
RANDY WORKMAN
Johnson v. Stanton, et al
as 2:2012cv02239
Petitioner:
Larry Dale Johnson
Respondent:
Gary R. Stanton, Solano County Public Defenders Office and Tom Barrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barrett v. Franco et al
as 2:2011cv02232
Petitioner:
Jack O'Neal Barrett
Respondent:
Unknown Franco and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jacob Barrett v. Max Williams, et al
as 10-35758
Petitioner - Appellant:
JACOB BARRETT
Respondent - Appellee:
MAX WILLIAMS and MARTY SIRMONS
Barrett v. Lamarque et al
as 1:2009cv01047
Petitioner:
Robert E Barrett
Respondent:
A A LaMarque and Jerry Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
