Cases 1 - 10 of 3,478
Duran v. The People of the State of California
as 3:2024cv01625
Respondent:
The People of the State of California
Petitioner:
David B. Duran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Borchers v. State of Oregon
as 2:2024cv01484
Petitioner:
Joseph David Borchers
Respondent:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Giusti v. Faulder et al
as 3:2024cv06168
Petitioner:
David C. Giusti
Respondent:
District Attorney Keith Faulder and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Paule v. Gunther
as 2:2024cv02162
Respondent:
Jason Gunther
Petitioner:
David Jerry Paule
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Foster Johnson v. Jeff Macomber et al
as 2:2024cv07074
Respondent:
Jeff Macomber and David Holbrook
Petitioner:
Foster Johnson, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. State of Washington
as 2:2024cv01283
Petitioner:
David Allen Moore
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In Re Petition of David J. Charles
as 3:2024cv05111
Petitioner:
David J. Charles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Saechao v. Cates
as 2:2024cv02178
Petitioner:
David Saechao
Respondent:
B. Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Steve C. Moore v. David Holdbrook
as 2:2024cv06830
Respondent:
Mr. David Holdbrook
Petitioner:
Mr. Steve C. Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Jimenez v. Campbell
as 1:2024cv00840
Petitioner:
David Jimenez
Respondent:
Tammy L. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
