Cases 1 - 10 of 1,173
Gary L. Beavers v. Robert Broomfield
as 2:2024cv04941
Petitioner:
Gary L. Beavers
Respondent:
Robert Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robins v. Fairman et al
as 3:2024cv00086
Petitioner:
Damien Robins
Respondent:
Gary Fairman, Steve L. Dobrescy, Michael Bondgard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schulz et al v Petersen
as 9:2024cv00026
Petitioner:
Gary Schulz, David T. Crafton and Valentino Satoshi Vanderbilt
Respondent:
Jeremiah Petersen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Townsend
as 4:2023cv06102
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Gary Townsend
Defendant:
Warden Oak Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daniel Gary Esquivel v. Rob St. Andre
as 2:2023cv09946
Petitioner:
Daniel Gary Esquivel
Respondent:
Rob St. Andre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kachina v. Gutierrez
as 4:2023cv00531
Petitioner:
Gary Allen Kachina
Respondent:
M Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Eisenmann v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv02285
Petitioner:
Gary Lane Eisenmann
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sumontinee Sridej v. Antony Blinken, et al
as 23-16021
Petitioner / Appellant:
SUMONTINEE SRIDEJ
Respondent / Appellee:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, GARY SCHOFIELD and others
Hansen v. Knudsen
as 9:2023cv00068
Petitioner:
Gary Hansen
Respondent:
Austin Knudsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Applegate v. Multnomah County Sheriff's Office
as 3:2023cv00238
Petitioner:
Daniel Gary Applegate
Respondent:
Multnomah County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
