Cases 1 - 10 of 184
Morris Mester v. Dan Cueva
as 5:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
Morris Mester
Respondent:
Dan Cueva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Danny Morris v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15573
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANNY RAY MORRIS
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Davis #58392 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv00494
Petitioner:
Morris Earl Davis
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DeMocker v. Shinn et al
as 3:2022cv08203
Petitioner:
Steven Carroll DeMocker
Respondent:
David Shinn, Stephen Morris and Jeff Van Winkle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morris v. Reyes
as 2:2022cv01088
Petitioner:
Chris Alan Morris
Respondent:
Erin Reyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Knochel, et al v. Amy Fackrell, et al
as 20-17326
Respondent / Appellee:
UNKOWN PARTY, named as Medical Director - West Yavapai Guidance Clinic, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA, JOHN C. MORRIS and others
Petitioner:
EMILY NOELLE MIHAYLO
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES JOSEPH KNOCHEL
Mazen Aliahmad v. Gerald Morris
as 19-56405
Respondent / Appellee:
GERALD MORRIS, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
MAZEN ABDALLAH ALIAHMAD
Mazen Abdallah Aliahmad v. Gerald Morris
as 2:2018cv08499
Petitioner:
Mazen Abdallah Aliahmad
Respondent:
Gerald Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morris v. Uttecht
as 3:2021cv05015
Respondent:
Jeffrey Uttecht and Jeffrey A Uttecht
Petitioner:
Vernice M Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ricky Louis Alford v. Scott Kernan
as 2:2021cv00928
Petitioner:
Rickey Louis Alford and Morris Day
Respondent:
Scott Kernan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
