Cases 1 - 10 of 56
David Rey Fierro v. Charles Schuyler
as 2:2023cv09180
Petitioner:
David Rey Fierro
Respondent:
Charles Schuyler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David Bollinger v. William Gittere
as 23-99002
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID BOLLINGER
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM GITTERE, Warden
Scott Clabourne v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-99000
Petitioner / Appellant:
SCOTT DRAKE CLABOURNE
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director, of the Arizona Department of Corrections and CHARLES GOLDSMITH, Warden, Arizona State Prison - Eyman Complex
Anderson v. Shinn et al
as 3:2023cv08023
Petitioner:
Frank Winfield Anderson
Respondent:
David Shinn and Staci Ibarra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Ovante v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv02003
Petitioner:
Manuel Ovante
Respondent:
David Shinn and Staci Ibarra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Hooper v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv01935
Petitioner:
Murray Hooper
Respondent:
David Shinn, Staci Ibarra and Rodney Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Murray Hooper v. David Shinn, et al
as 22-99012
Petitioner / Appellant:
MURRAY HOOPER
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation & Reentry, STACI IBARRA, Warden, Eyman Prison and RODNEY CARR, Warden, Florence Prison
Womble v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv01429
Petitioner:
Brian Allen Womble
Respondent:
David Shinn and James Kimble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Alfredo Garcia v. David Shinn, et al
as 22-99007
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALFREDO LUCERO GARCIA
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and RON CREDIO, Warden, Arizona State Prison - Eyman Complex
Clarence Dixon v. David Shinn
as 22-99006
Petitioner / Appellant:
CLARENCE WAYNE DIXON
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
