Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Linthecome v. Alfaro et al
as 1:2014cv01438
Plaintiff:
Marcus Leon Linthecome
Defendant:
Sandra Alfaro, NKSP Mailroom Staff, NKSP Appeals Coordinators and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Bryan v. Terrie Matsen, et al
as 14-35493
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD WESLEY BRYAN
Defendant - Appellee:
TERRIE MATSEN, SCCC Mailroom Staff, CHERYL SULLIVAN, SCCC Mailroom Sergeant, KERRI S. MCTARSNEY, SCCC Grievance Coordinator and others
Williamson v. CSP Solano Mailroom Staff, et al.
as 2:2013cv01978
Plaintiff:
Freddie Lee Williamson
Defendant:
CSP Solano Mailroom Staff, Postmaster of the U.S. Postal Service and Gary Swarthout
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
George Bartz v. Maggie Miller-Stout, et al
as 13-35380
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE BARTZ
Defendant - Appellee:
MAGGIE MILLER-STOUT, INMATE BANKING AND MAILROOM STAFF, JANE DOES 1-15 and others
Reed v. Byrnes et al
as 2:2013cv00081
Plaintiff:
Matthew Reed
Defendant:
Donna Byrnes, Garvin, Rebecca Dyson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seavon Pierce v. Fernando Gonzales, et al
as 13-15114
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SEAVON PIERCE
Defendant - Appellee:
FERNANDO GONZALES, Warden, DIRECTOR OF CORRECTIONS, MAILROOM STAFF and others
LaTanya Cramer v. Nunez et al
as 2:2013cv00214
Plaintiff:
LaTanya Cramer
Defendant:
Lieutenant Mailroom, Mailroom Staff, Captain Nunez and others
Usrey v. Deyott et al
as 6:2012cv00092
Plaintiff:
Ricky Joe Usrey
Defendant:
Denise Deyott, Mike Ferriter and Montana State Prison Mailroom Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darrell Parks v. Wren et al
as 5:2012cv01353
Defendant:
All Mailroom Staffs, Tom Brody, Stephen Casey and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell Parks
Owen Lino v. J. Kellerman, et al
as 11-57193
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OWEN LINO
Defendant - Appellee:
J. KELLERMAN, Facility Captain, J. T. OCHOA, Chief Deputy Warden, G. J. JANDA, Associate Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
