Cases 41 - 50 of 156
Nichols v. Richardson et al
as 1:2018cv00350
Defendant:
Thompson, John P Barroso, Bollman and others
Plaintiff:
Dominique Nichols
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Lizarraga et al
as 2:2018cv01472
Plaintiff:
David Watson
Defendant:
Joe A. Lizarraga, E. Pedersen, J. Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earnest Woods, II v. Darrell Adams, et al
as 18-15410
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARNEST CASSELL WOODS II
Defendant - Appellee:
DARRELL ADAMS, Warden at Corcoran State Prison, MAURICE JUNIOUS, Chief Deputy Warden at CCI, NICHOLS and others
Adams v. Richmond Police Department
as 4:2018cv01557
Plaintiff:
Henry Desean Adams
Defendant:
Richmond Police Department, Ken Greco and Nichole Abetvko
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nichols v. Kerrean et al
as 3:2018cv00518
Plaintiff:
Jason Nichols
Defendant:
Scott Kerrean, E. Patty, C. Vizcarra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nichols v. Shartle et al
as 4:2017cv00614
Plaintiff:
James Edward Nichols
Defendant:
JT Shartle, Unknown Wesley, Unknown McMillan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Redford v. Martone et al
as 2:2017cv03973
Plaintiff:
Earl Douglas Redford, Jr.
Defendant:
Frederic Martone, Unknown Norton, Unknown Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Francis Grandinetti, II v. S. Mowry, et al
as 17-16450
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANCIS ANTHONY GRANDINETTI II
Defendant - Appellee:
S. MOWRY, LPN, M. ORTEGA, C.O.; appearing as HSA agents for SCC and CCA in Arizona, GOEDECKE, Dr. Goedecke, M.D. and others
Harden et al v. NDOC HDSP Deputy Director et al
as 2:2017cv01826
Defendant:
Associate Warden, Classification Specialist, Deputy warden and others
Plaintiff:
Harold D Harden, Mark Johnas Jr, Calvin Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hollinquest v. Nichols et al
as 2:2017cv00797
Plaintiff:
Dasay Hollinquest
Defendant:
Russ Nichols et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
