Cases 71 - 80 of 82,442
James Thomas Ruiz v. G. Sanchez Jr. et al
as 2:2024cv03897
Plaintiff:
James Thomas Ruiz
Defendant:
G. Sanchez, Jr., Zunaga, Crosby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniel Harper v. C. Chatman
as 2:2024cv03902
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Harper
Defendant:
C Chatman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spikes v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2024cv00528
Plaintiff:
Quiwaneca Spikes
Defendant:
State of Nevada and Administrative
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. The People of the State of California
as 3:2024cv00858
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Berry v. Wallace et al
as 6:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Thomas Leonard Berry
Defendant:
Wallace, Dirkson, Garibay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dillard v. Scarborough et al
as 3:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Anthony Samuel Dillard
Defendant:
Collado Scarborough, Sarah Angol, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tholson v. Luper
as 3:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Leon M. Tholson
Defendant:
D. Luper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Twiss #359160 v. Thornell et al
as 4:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Matthew Aaron Twiss
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Unknown Party, Unknow Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montgomery #301029 v. Morales et al
as 2:2024cv01103
Plaintiff:
Curtis Montgomery
Defendant:
Heather Morales, Mesa Police Department, Michael Kemp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Koroma v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2024cv01088
Plaintiff:
Konbeh Koroma
Defendant:
Francesco Morales, Saint Vincent De Paul, Marinda Balevic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
