Cases 1 - 10 of 440
Pierce
as 6:2024cv00595
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey A Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murry v. Caughron et al
as 4:2024cv05019
Plaintiff:
Roy Howard Murry
Defendant:
Desaraye Caughron, Derek Anderson, Gabriel Lapsley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. State of Oregon
as 3:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jason Pierce, Sr.
Defendant:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. State of Oregon
as 3:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jason Pierce, Sr.
Defendant:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Dorton v. Tostonie, et al.
as 1:2023cv01784
Plaintiff:
Fred Dorton
Defendant:
Steve Tostonie, J Kimes, D. Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corbray v. Horne et al
as 3:2023cv05841
Plaintiff:
Dennis Derise Corbray
Defendant:
Gerarld A Horne and Pierce County Prosecuting Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yerly v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2023cv05752
Plaintiff:
Dominik A Yerly
Defendant:
Pierce County, Patti Jackson, Ed Troyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rozier v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2023cv05724
Plaintiff:
Timothy Eugene Rozier
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, Sieverson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. Superior Court, County of Humboldt
as 5:2023cv04018
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel D. Pierce
Defendant:
Superior Court, County of Humboldt, Humboldt County Correction Facility, Sheriff Department County of Mendocino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stacy v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2023cv05718
Plaintiff:
Scott Ryan Stacy
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, Sieverson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
