Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Williams v. White et al
as 2:2023cv01587
Plaintiff:
Darwin L Williams
Defendant:
Dan White, C Klimper, E Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Gonzalez v. Fiorella et al
as 1:2023cv01359
Plaintiff:
Jaime Cesar Gonzalez
Defendant:
M Fiorella, E Jackson, K. Ruiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Lay, et al.
as 1:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Jackson
Defendant:
Lonnie Lay, Tom Carter, Twin Falls County Adult Detention Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Ivy Medical et al
as 1:2022cv00301
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Jackson
Defendant:
Ivy Medical, Nurse Amanda, - Officer Kimball and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Hutchings et al
as 2:2021cv01788
Plaintiff:
Donald E. Jackson
Defendant:
William Hutchings, Steve Sisolak, Monique Pickett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson et al v. Twin Falls City et al
as 1:2020cv00485
Defendant:
Twin Falls County, Idaho Dept of Corections, State of Idaho and others
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Jackson and Jason Harmon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Twin Falls City Idaho, et al.
as 1:2020cv00449
Defendant:
Twinn Falls County Sherriffs Dept, Justin Cyr, Twinn Falls City Idaho and others
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. United States
as 2:2015cv00329
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Jackson
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lamon Jackson v. D. Sisto, et al
as 10-17331
Petitioner - Appellant:
LAMON E. JACKSON
Respondent - Appellee:
D. K. SISTO, Warden
Defendant - Appellee:
T. SEQUIRA, E. GUMS and M. FUSSOTTI
Jackson v. Sisto, et al
as 2:2008cv02502
Plaintiff:
Lamon E. Jackson
Defendant:
D. K. Sisto, T Sequira, A. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
