Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Muhammad v. Finn et al
as 6:2021cv00078
Plaintiff:
Tariq Muhammad
Defendant:
Ellen Rosenblum, Finn and John/Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Brown et al
as 6:2020cv02127
Defendant:
Governor Kate Brown, Dir. Colette Peters, Oregon Dept. of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Tariq Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Finn
as 2:2020cv00998
Plaintiff:
Richard Wayne Thompson
Defendant:
Elizabeth Finn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCoy v. Finn et al
as 1:2018cv00123
Plaintiff:
Garrett M McCoy
Defendant:
Brian Finn, Management Training Corporation and Correctional Alternative Placement Program
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Sinclair et al
as 4:2015cv05016
Plaintiff:
Gregory Johnson
Defendant:
Steve Sinclair, Christopher Bowman, Ronald Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walter Langston v. Finn, et al
as 13-15988
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALTER SHANE LANGSTON
Defendant - Appellee:
FINN, CATER, BEVERLY SWANSON and others
Fred Gilbert v. Claude Finn, et al
as 11-17768
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRED DWAYNE GILBERT
Defendant - Appellee:
CLAUDE FINN, C. WRIGHT, M. FOX, Dr. and others
Craig Dawson, et al v. Finn, et al
as 11-35747
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG THOMAS DAWSON and SUSAN DAWSON
Defendant - Appellee:
FINN, Prison Guard, RICHARDS, Prison Guard, JEFF PREMO, Supt. Oregon State Penitentiary and others
Craig Dawson, et al v. Finn, et al
as 11-35486
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG THOMAS DAWSON and SUSAN DAWSON
Defendant - Appellee:
FINN, Prison Guard, RICHARDS, Prison Guard, JEFF PREMO, Supt. Oregon State Penitentiary and others
Walter Langston v. Claudia Finn, et al
as 11-15669
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALTER SHANE LANGSTON
Defendant - Appellee:
CLAUDIA FINN, Warden, Deuel Vocational Institution, KEVIN JONES, Parole Agent, Sacramento Region, J. L. BROWN, Correctional Case Record Anys. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
