Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Johnny Warren v. Mark Napier, et al
as 22-15717
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHNNY LEE WARREN
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK NAPIER, Sheriff at Pima County Jail, LAURA CONOVER, County Attorney at Superior Court, DEBORAH BERNINI, named as Hon. Bernini, Div. 12, Judge at Superior Court and others
Warren v. Napier et al
as 4:2021cv00540
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lee Warren
Defendant:
Mark Napier, Laura Conover, Deborah Bernini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brumfield v. Napier et al
as 4:2018cv00555
Defendant:
Victoria Otto, Keith A Bee, Mark D Napier and others
Plaintiff:
Quaraii Rashad Brumfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
High v. Pima County Jail et al
as 4:2018cv00474
Defendant:
Unknown Lariza, Arizona, State of, Unknown Parties and others
Plaintiff:
Harold Lee High, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Florence v. Keating
as 2:2018cv02066
Defendant:
Unknown Keating
Plaintiff:
Alexander Napier Florence
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nunez v. Napier et al
as 4:2018cv00244
Plaintiff:
Micheal Andrew Nunez
Defendant:
Mark D Napier, Joshua Arnold, Pima County Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Appolon #324876 v. Napier et al
as 4:2018cv00095
Plaintiff:
Esterlin Appolon
Defendant:
Mark Napier, Unknown Party, Superior Court of the State of Arizona and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Poorbear v. Napier et al
as 2:2017cv01229
Plaintiff:
Quentin Ellis Poorbear
Defendant:
Kenny Napier, Jason Alty, Kathy Cavanagh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valencia v. Maxwell et al
as 4:2015cv00499
Plaintiff:
Alberto Arellano Valencia
Defendant:
Brandon Maxwell, Travis Napier, Tucson Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bartle v. Batista et al
as 6:2013cv00074
Plaintiff:
Stephen Heath Bartle
Defendant:
Mike Batista, Leroy Kirkegard, Dan Hess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
