Cases 1 - 10 of 92
(PC) Blackman v. Hill et al
as 2:2024cv01149
Plaintiff:
Tony Blackman
Defendant:
J. Hill, Jennifer Damies, S. D. Rutledge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Hounihan v. Rushing et al
as 1:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
Jason Scott Hounihan
Defendant:
Rushing and Carranza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morales v. Rushing et al
as 2:2024cv00390
Plaintiff:
Yoandy Fernandez Morales
Defendant:
Rushing, Flamm, J. Issacson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rushing v. Yakima County Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv03138
Plaintiff:
Thomas Rushing
Defendant:
Yakima County Department of Corrections and Walla Walla State Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Packard v. Ashworth et al
as 2:2023cv00793
Plaintiff:
Jacob Packard
Defendant:
Kristoffer Ashworth, Q Rush, Darren Frei and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clinton Rush v. Andrew Weinstein, et al
as 23-35018
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLINTON B RUSH
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW WEINSTEIN, DONALD HEIDA, JANET MURAKAMI and others
Rush v. Idaho Department of Corrections
as 1:2022cv00391
Petitioner:
James Rush
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rahman Rashad Rushing v. California Rehabilitation Center et al
as 5:2021cv01004
Defendant:
John Doe, California Rehabilitation Center and Cynthia Y. Tampkins
Plaintiff:
Rahman Rashad Rushing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rahman R Rushing v. Cynthia Y. Tampkins et al
as 2:2020cv06513
Plaintiff:
Rahman R Rushing
Defendant:
State of California, Cynthia Y. Tampkins and Mona D. Houston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rahman R Rushing v. State of California et al
as 5:2020cv01247
Defendant:
State of California, John Doe CC s, Cynthia Y Tamkins and others
Plaintiff:
Rahman R. Rushing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
