Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Michael Hayes v. The Entity, et al
as 23-35002
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL T. HAYES
Defendant / Appellee:
THE ENTITY, (IDOC), TIMOTHY R. MCKAY, DAVID E. DIETZ and others
Hayes v. IDOC, et al.
as 1:2022cv00435
Plaintiff:
Michael T Hayes
Defendant:
IDOC, Jay Christensen, Timothy McKay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. The Entity (IDOC), et al.
as 1:2022cv00305
Plaintiff:
Michael T Hayes
Defendant:
The Entity (IDOC), Jay Christensen, Timothy R. McKay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Rice v. Boulware et al
as 2:2020cv01752
Defendant:
C. Johnson, A. W. Brown, M. Ackley and others
Plaintiff:
Royland Rice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Slaughter v. Fleenor et al
as 4:2017cv05128
Plaintiff:
Ossie Lee Slaughter
Defendant:
Steve Fleenor, Joella Phillips, Ron Jensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lievers v. Arizona Corrections, Department of et al
as 3:2009cv08051
Plaintiff:
Michael S Lievers
Defendant:
Arizona Corrections, Department of, Management & Training Corporation, Dora B. Schriro and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Elroy Browning v. Jeanne Woodford, et al
as 08-15839
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELROY W. BROWNING
Defendant - Appellee:
JEANNE S. WOODFORD, A. K. SCRIBNER, D. D. SHEPPARD-BROOKS and others
Brown v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2007cv01769
Plaintiff:
Timothy W. Brown
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and DeWhite
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown -v- California Department of Corrections
as 5:2007cv00317
Plaintiff:
Timothy W. Brown
Defendant:
ADA Coordinator, California Department of Corrections & Rehabilation, D.V.I. Tracy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
