Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Ivar Voits v. Kate Brown, et al
as 23-35165
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IVAR VOITS
Defendant / Appellee:
KATE BROWN, Mss., SHEMIA FAGAN, COLETTE PETERS and others
Derrick L. Hairston v. Kathleen Blanchard et al
as 2:2023cv01338
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lamar Hairston
Defendant:
Kathleen Blanchard, Edward F. Wiley, Hung Du and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Voits v. Brown et al
as 2:2022cv01365
Defendant:
Mss. Kelcie Main, Mss. Kate Brown, Shemia Fagan and others
Plaintiff:
Ivar Voits
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Randon Miller v. City of Scottsdale, et al
as 22-16004
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDON L. MILLER
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF SCOTTSDALE, a municipal entity, CHRISTIAN BAILEY, in his official and individual capacities, MICHAEL MALECHA, in his official and individual capacities and others
Patrick Wiley v. R. Masterson, et al
as 22-15895
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK WILEY
Defendant / Appellee:
R. MASTERSON, Correctional Officer, Z. ROBBERECHT, Correctional Lieutenant, J. EDER, Correctional Sergeant and others
Andrew Moret v. Kate Brown, et al
as 22-35424
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW GUY MORET
Defendant / Appellee:
KATE BROWN, STATE OF OREGON, OREGON DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Wiley v. State of California
as 3:2022cv03153
Plaintiff:
Jason Wesley Wiley
Defendant:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrew Moret v. Kate Brown, et al
as 22-35016
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW GUY MORET
Defendant / Appellee:
KATE BROWN, STATE OF OREGON, OREGON DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Andrew Moret v. Kate Brown, et al
as 22-35018
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW GUY MORET
Defendant / Appellee:
KATE BROWN, STATE OF OREGON, OREGON DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Miller v. Scottsdale, City of et al
as 2:2021cv00834
Plaintiff:
Randon L Miller
Defendant:
Ryan Lowing, Michael Malecha, Christian Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
