Cases 11 - 20 of 48
Barton v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2021cv00629
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Mike Gower, Colette Peters and others
Plaintiff:
Janelle Barton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Blanscet v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2021cv00301
Plaintiff:
William Blanscet
Defendant:
Oregon State Penitentiary, Does 1 through 3, Dr. Paulson Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Snider et al v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2020cv00510
Defendant:
Lieutenant Jason Duchek, Sue Washburn, Sargent Roberts and others
Plaintiff:
Esteban Vallejo, Bobby Swearingen, Casey Snider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez v. Washburn
as 2:2018cv02071
Defendant:
Sue Washburn and State of Oregon
Plaintiff:
Jose Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bean v. Matteucci
as 3:2018cv01765
Petitioner:
Travis LeRoy Bean
Respondent:
Dolly Matteucci
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mora-Contreras et al v. Peters et al
as 6:2018cv00678
Defendant:
John Does, Zachary Gould, Meghan Leddy and others
Plaintiff:
Rafael Mora-Contreras and Shane Staggs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin et al v. Clackamas County et al
as 3:2017cv01924
Defendant:
Christopher Barton, Clackamas County, Timothy Conger and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rains v. Edwards et al
as 3:2015cv00915
Defendant:
Dr. Adams, Dan Berger, Dr. Buckler and others
Plaintiff:
John Rains
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Deverell v. Rex et al
as 3:2015cv00836
Plaintiff:
Nina Deverell
Defendant:
Dr. Sean Elliott, Jane Does 1-10, John Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Piatt v. Nooth et al
as 3:2010cv00932
Defendant:
Jamie Miller, Mark Nooth, L. Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Scott Piatt
Debtor:
F. Serrano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
