Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Sheehan v. CDCR - Jamestown et al
as 3:2012cv05624
Plaintiff:
Randall Lee Sheehan
Defendant:
CDCR - Jamestown and E. Cervantes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. Struffert
as 3:2012cv04698
Plaintiff:
Wayne J. Robertson
Defendant:
W. Struffert, A. Perpiot, D. Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vensor v. Central Arizona Correctional Facility et al
as 2:2012cv01780
Plaintiff:
Randee R Vensor
Defendant:
Central Arizona Correctional Facility, Arizona Department of Corrections, Unknown Parties and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cofield v. Swarthout et al
as 3:2012cv03021
Plaintiff:
Vincent E. Cofield
Defendant:
Swarthout, Zamora, Brida and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cervantes v. Magat et al
as 3:2012cv02489
Plaintiff:
Henry Cervantes
Defendant:
Maria Luisita Magat and Corizon Health Medical Center of Santa Rita County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cunningham v. Director of CDCR et al
as 3:2011cv00368
Plaintiff:
Sean Cunningham
Defendant:
D. Ramos and M. Cervantes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cervantes v. San Jose Regional Trauma Center, et al.
as 3:2009cv00071
Plaintiff:
Hugo Cervantes
Defendant:
San Jose Regional Trauma Center and Monterey Sheriffs Department
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Louis Cervantes v. Richard Pratt, et al
as 08-17596
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS T. CERVANTES
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD L. PRATT, ROBERT D. JONES, PATRICIA A. STAPLER and others
Louis Cervantes v. Richard Pratt, et al
as 08-16817
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS T. CERVANTES
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD L. PRATT, ROBERT D. JONES, PATRICIA A. STAPLER and others
Louis Cervantes v. Richard Pratt, et al
as 08-15422
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS T. CERVANTES
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD L. PRATT, ROBERT D. JONES, PATRICIA A. STAPLER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
