Cases 21 - 30 of 227
Trevino v. Dotson et al
as 3:2023cv01311
Plaintiff:
Robert Trevino
Defendant:
E. Dotson, T. Ross, S. Newcomb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. Shinn et al
as 2:2023cv00284
Plaintiff:
Dwain A Ward, Jr.
Defendant:
David Shinn, Unknown Posey, Unknown Bresan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Birchett v. Garrison et al
as 2:2023cv00241
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wayne Birchett, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Garrison, Unknown Keleman and Unknown Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. Garrison et al
as 2:2023cv00242
Plaintiff:
James R Hunter
Defendant:
Unknown Garrison, Unknown Keleman and Unknown Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Verduzco v. Mickey Price, et al
as 23-15127
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL VERDUZCO
Defendant / Appellee:
MICKEY PRICE, Chief Mental Health Psychologist, R. LIMON, Chief Psychologist, HANNAH E. BUSH and others
Flores #270776 v. Scott et al
as 2:2023cv00186
Plaintiff:
Arturo M Flores
Defendant:
Lori Scott, Unknown Scott, Rondald Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Osborn v. Gawlik et al
as 2:2022cv02179
Plaintiff:
Michael R Osborn
Defendant:
Michael Gawlik, Keith Olson, Erick Akers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Gipson v. Ascencio
as 5:2022cv09054
Plaintiff:
Faitdon Gipson
Defendant:
T. Ascencio, Carlos Casillas, L. Dossman-Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Atchley et al
as 3:2022cv05825
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ray Baker
Defendant:
M. Atchley, T. Lemon, E. Borla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Catlin et al
as 4:2022cv04933
Plaintiff:
Javaughn K. Robinson
Defendant:
Catlin, Ayala, Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
