Cases 1 - 10 of 1,555
Elghembri v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv03071
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Mohammad Elghembri
Defendant:
John Doe, John Doe, Two and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elghembri v. Doe, Dentist et al
as 3:2024cv02771
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Mohamed Elghembri
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Dentist, John Doe, Dentist and Theodore Ng
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Das v. Medvin, et al
as 3:2024cv02477
Plaintiff:
Damodar Chandra Das
Defendant:
John Doe and Newman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kepler et al v. NaphCare Incorporated et al
as 4:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Karina Kepler, Carlin Casey and Mary Hutchinson
Defendant:
NaphCare Incorporated, Pima, County of, Chris Nanos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox #095548 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00705
Plaintiff:
Walter John Cox, Jr.
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Charles L Ryan, Lori Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. CDCR et al
as 4:2024cv01856
Plaintiff:
John W. Williams
Defendant:
CDCR and Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hummer #042501 v. NaphCare Incorporated
as 2:2024cv00556
Plaintiff:
John Hummer
Defendant:
NaphCare Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sandoval-Verdugo #351620 v. NaphCare et al
as 2:2024cv00520
Plaintiff:
Marisol Sandoval-Verdugo
Defendant:
NaphCare, Gemini John, Steven Madrid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bishop-McKean v. Murray et al
as 3:2024cv05199
Plaintiff:
Renee Bishop-McKean
Defendant:
Justin Murray, Carlson, Paul Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez #103830 v. John et al
as 2:2024cv00489
Plaintiff:
Sonia Ann Rodriguez
Defendant:
Gemini John, NaphCare, Unknown Malcome and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
