Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Armstrong #314416 v. Ramos et al
as 2:2023cv02401
Plaintiff:
Kpou Armstrong
Defendant:
Alfred Ramos, Fransisco Hernandez and Mia Baldenegro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaheed-Muhammad, #148986 v. Centurion Arizona et al
as 2:2021cv02103
Plaintiff:
Azuzallah Shaheed-Muhammad
Defendant:
Centurion Arizona, Unknown Stickley, Unknown Montez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raul Cervantes v. Daniel Moisa et al
as 2:2021cv06268
Plaintiff:
Raul Cervantes
Defendant:
Daniel Moisa, Chief Deputy Warden R. C. Johnson, Warden (L.A.C.) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cervantes v. Moisa et al
as 1:2021cv05834
Plaintiff:
Raul Cervantes
Defendant:
Daniel Moisa, R. C. Johnson, Warden, LAC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitall v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2020cv01259
Defendant:
Milagnos Cacino, Rosselle Baldenado, Hang Le and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Richard Whitall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clouse v. Alternatives Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00078
Plaintiff:
Brett Wade Clouse
Defendant:
Betty Ann Roan, Loretta Willems, Alternatives Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2019cv02656
Plaintiff:
Bradley P Armstrong
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Paul Penzone, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Watts et al
as 3:2017cv00533
Plaintiff:
Eric W. Armstrong
Defendant:
Scott Henroid, Mingo, Sawyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Doss v. Vega et al
as 3:2017cv01218
Plaintiff:
Jimmie L. Doss, Jr.
Defendant:
Vega, Domingez, A. Liem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Threats v. Beard
as 3:2015cv02284
Plaintiff:
Derlyn Ray Threats
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard, Michael D. Stainer, Martin Hosnino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
