Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Trotter #362064 v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00646
Plaintiff:
Jermain D Trotter
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Maria M Carkuff, D W Quintero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benjamin Freeman v. David Shinn, et al
as 22-16667
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENJAMIN FREEMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director, Director at ADOCRR, J MACADOREY, Complex Warden, D QUINTERO, Deputy Warden at Cibola, Yuma and others
Tartt v. Roberts et al
as 4:2018cv00510
Defendant:
D. W. Monson, Unknown Towle, Julie Roberts and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald Tartt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tartt v. Roberts et al
as 5:2018cv05780
Defendant:
D. W. Monson, Meegan Muse, Towle and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald Tartt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frost v. Hallock et al
as 3:2017cv07229
Plaintiff:
Shawn Kevin Frost, Sr.
Defendant:
J. Hallock, J. Hunt, T. A. Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melinda Valenzuela v. D. Masoon, et al
as 17-17406
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELINDA GABRIELLA VALENZUELA
Defendant - Appellee:
D. W. MASOON, CORIZON, LLC, MARTIN VELAZQUEZ and others
Ramirez #147145 v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2015cv01164
Plaintiff:
Angel Javier Ramirez
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Unknown Banuelos-Encinas, Unknown McClellan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott Cook v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 14-16769
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SCOTT TROY COOK
Defendant - Appellant:
MATTHEW CATE, Current Director of CDCR, F. JUAQUEZ, Current Warden at PBSP, G. D. LEWIS, Previous Warden at PBSP and others
Thompson v. Bradburry et al
as 3:2014cv01988
Plaintiff:
DeWayne R. Thompson
Defendant:
D. W. Bradburry and Flowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Ryan et al
as 2:2014cv00703
Plaintiff:
Antonio Jones
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Thomas C Horne, Janice K Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
