Cases 51 - 60 of 10,110
Matter v. Elkhorn Logistics Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv00716
Plaintiff:
Jesse Matter
Defendant:
Elkhorn Logistics Corporation and Kyle Woodruff
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0216 Fair Labor Standards Act
Margret Hill et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2024cv03484
Plaintiff:
Margret Hill and Trenita Wilson
Defendant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES
Wright v. Virtual Benefit Solutions Incorporated Hearing Clinic et al
as 3:2024cv08081
Plaintiff:
Sarah Wright
Defendant:
Virtual Benefit Solutions Incorporated Hearing Clinic, Tyrone Moore and Unknown Moore
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Greist et al v. LendUS, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv02411
Plaintiff:
Barbara Greist and Susan Schell
Defendant:
LendUS, LLC and CrossCountry Mortgage, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Richardson v. Tessenderlo Kerley Incorporated
as 2:2024cv00921
Plaintiff:
Jonah Richardson
Defendant:
Tessenderlo Kerley Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Keith v. LaserAway Holdings LLC et al
as 3:2024cv02380
Plaintiff:
Angelica Keith
Defendant:
LaserAway Holdings LLC and LaserAway Medical Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Su v. TTM Incorporated
as 1:2024cv00181
Petitioner:
Julie A. Su
Respondent:
TTM Incorporated a corporation doing business as Diamondhead Sprinklers and Toby Mannella
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jimenez v. Underground Supply West LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00906
Plaintiff:
Jose Del Carmen Camacho Jimenez
Defendant:
Underground Supply West LLC, James G Regan and Carrie S Regan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Villanueva v. Figure Lending LLC
as 3:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
Albert Villanueva
Defendant:
Figure Lending LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
