Cases 21 - 30 of 48
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. Bureau of Land Management et al
as 3:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity, Defenders of Wildlife, Friends of the Earth and others
Defendant:
Bureau of Land Management, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, National Marine Fisheries Service and others
Petitioner:
ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc. and Arctic Slope Regional Corporation
Intervenor Defendant:
North Slope Borough, Kuukpik Corporation and State of Alaska
Amicus Curiae:
Lisa Murkowski, Dan Sullivan, Mary Sattler Peltola and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Maritime Subsidy Board
Center for Biological Diversity v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 4:2023cv00113
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity
Defendant:
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Martha Williams and Deb Haaland
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
WildEarth Guardians, et al v. Kurtis Steele, et al
as 23-35125
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, a non-profit organization, WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, a non-profit organization, SWAN VIEW COALITION and others
Defendant / Appellant:
KURTIS E. STEELE, in his capacity as Forest Supervisor for the Flathead National Forest, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, a federal agency, MARTHA WILLIAMS, in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Director, Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
MONTANA LOGGING ASSOCIATION and AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL
Cook Inletkeeper et al v. U.S. Department of the Interior et al
as 3:2022cv00279
Plaintiff:
Cook Inletkeeper, Alaska Community Action on Toxics, Center for Biological Diversity and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Amanda Lefton and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. Haaland et al
as 2:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity, Western Watersheds Project and Pat Munday
Defendant:
Deb Haaland, Martha Williams and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Wildearth Guardians et al v. Bucknall et al
as 9:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
Wildearth Guardians, Western Watersheds Project and Trap Free Montana
Defendant:
Janet Bucknall, Dalin Tidwell, United States Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Bureau of Land Management et al
as 2:2022cv08824
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity
Defendant:
U.S. Bureau of Land Management, Deb Haaland, Jeffery Childers and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Montana Environmental Information Center, et al v. Westmoreland Rosebud Mining LLC, et al
as 22-36002
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MONTANA ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION CENTER, INDIAN PEOPLE'S ACTION, 350 MONTANA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DEB HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of the Interior, U. S. OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT, an agency within the U. S. Department of the Interior, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, a federal agency and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
WESTMORELAND ROSEBUD MINING LLC and INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, LOCAL 400
Cottonwood Environmental Law Center v. Deb Haaland, et al
as 22-35976
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COTTONWOOD ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER
Defendant / Appellee:
DEB HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, CAM SHOLLY, in his official capacity as Park Superintendent, Yellowstone National Park, LEANNE MARTEN, in her official capacity as Regional Forester, U.S. Forest Service and others
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. Moore et al
as 4:2022cv00412
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity, Maricopa Audubon Society and Mount Graham Coalition
Defendant:
Randy Moore, Tom Vilsack, Deb Haaland and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
