Cases 1 - 10 of 55
GUAM SOCIETY OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS, et al v. Douglas Moylan, et al
as 23-15602
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GUAM SOCIETY OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS, GUAM NURSES ASSOCIATION, MILTON H. COLE, Jr., Reverend and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DOUGLAS B. MOYLAN, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Guam
Defendant / Appellee:
LOURDES LEON GUERRERO, in her official capacity as Governor of Guam, ARTHUR U. SAN AGUSTIN, MHR, in his official capacity as Director of the Department of Public Health and Social Services, LILLIAN PEREZ-POSADAS, M.N., R.N., in her official capacity as Administrator of the Guam Memorial Hospital and others
Americans for Prosperity et al v. Meyer et al
as 2:2023cv00470
Plaintiff:
Americans for Prosperity and Americans for Prosperity Foundation
Defendant:
Damien R Meyer, Amy B Chan, Galen D Paton and others
Petitioner:
Voters' Right to Know and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Paul Isaacson, et al v. Kristin Mayes, et al
as 23-15234
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL A. ISAACSON, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients, ERIC M. REUSS, M.D., M.P.H,; on behalf of himself and his patients, NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN, INC., Arizona Section and others
Defendant / Appellee:
KRISTIN K. MAYES, in her official capacity as Arizona Attorney General, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, JENNIFER CUNICO, o in her official capacity as Interim Director of the Arizona Department of Health Services and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. WHITING, County Attorney for Apache County, in his official capacity, BRIAN M. MCINTYRE, County Attorney for Cochise County, in his official capacity, WILLIAM PATRICK RING, County Attorney for Coconino County, in his official capacity and others
Intervenor:
BEN TOMA and WARREN PETERSEN
Esparza v. Lenox Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv09004
Plaintiff:
Miguel Esparza
Defendant:
Lenox Corporation a Delaware corporation d/b/a Lenox.com and Does 1 through 25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Licea v. Mattress Firm, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv09002
Plaintiff:
Jose Licea
Defendant:
Mattress Firm, Inc. a Delaware Corporation d/b/a MATTRESSFIRM.COM and Does 1 through 25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Hernandez v. University of Washington et al
as 2:2022cv01650
Plaintiff:
Armando Hernandez
Defendant:
University of Washington, Philip J Reid, Helen B Garrett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Constitutionality of State Statutes
San Franciscans Supporting Prop B, et al v. David Chiu, et al
as 22-15824
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAN FRANCISCANS SUPPORTING PROP B, EDWIN M LEE ASIAN PACIFIC DEMOCRATIC CLUB PAC SPONSORED BY NEIGHBORS FOR A BETTER SAN FRANCISCO ADVOCACY and TODD DAVID
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID CHIU, in his official capacity as San Francisco City Attorney, SAN FRANCISCO ETHICS COMMISSION, CHESA BOUDIN, in his official capacity as San Francisco District Attorney and others
San Franciscans Supporting Prop B et al v. Chiu et al
as 3:2022cv02785
Plaintiff:
San Franciscans Supporting Prop B, Edwin M Lee Asian Pacific Democratic Club PAC Sponsored by Neighbors for a Better San Francisco Advocacy and Todd David
Defendant:
David Chiu, San Francisco Ethics Commission, Chesa Boudin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
American Academy Of Implant Dentistry et al v. Prisby et al
as 3:2021cv01182
Plaintiff:
American Academy Of Implant Dentistry, D.M.D. James Miller and D.M.D. Nathan Doyel
Defendant:
Stephen Prisby, R.D.H. Yadira Martinez, R.D.H. Alicia Riedman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
People of the State of California v. Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency
as 3:2020cv03150
Plaintiff:
People of the State of California
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency and Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency d/b/a Fedloan agent of d/b/a Fedloan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
