Cases 1 - 4 of 4
The United States v. State of Idaho
as 1:2022cv00329
Plaintiff:
The United States and United States of America
Defendant:
State of Idaho
Intervenor Defendant:
Speaker of the Idaho House of Representatives Scott Bedke, Idaho Senate President Pro Tempore Chuck Winder, and the Sixty-Sixth Idaho Legislature
Amicus Curiae:
New York, State of, California, State of, Connecticut, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company et al v. Becerra et al
as 3:2020cv01990
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra and Summer Stephan
Plaintiff:
Neighborhood Market Association, Inc., R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Philip Morris USA Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Mental and Public Health Organizations
Amicus Curiae:
Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, American Lung Association, African American Tobacco Control Leadership Council and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Creation of a Remedy - Declaration of Rights
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company et al v. County of San Diego et al
as 3:2020cv01290
Defendant:
Helen N. Robbins-Meyer and County of San Diego
Plaintiff:
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company and Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
Public Health Law Center, African American Tobacco Control Leadership Council, American Lung Association and others
Petitioner:
Mental and Public Health Organizations
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Planned Parenthood Arizona Incorporated et al v. Brnovich et al
as 2:2015cv01022
Plaintiff:
Planned Parenthood Arizona Incorporated , Eric Reuss , Paul A Isaacson and others
Defendant:
Mark Brnovich , Cara M Christ , Patricia E McSorley and others
Amicu:
American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists
Movant:
American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists , American Medical Association and Arizona Medical Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
