Cases 101 - 110 of 277,247
Rizzi v. Christopher Palms, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00503
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00820
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States of America v. $40,677.00 US Currency
as 4:2020cv05217
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Tucson Cathodes & Tankhouse Service LLC et al v. National Drayage Services DE LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
Tucson Cathodes & Tankhouse Service LLC and ICL Catodos Limitada
Defendant:
National Drayage Services DE LLC and Skyline Entertainment LLC
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 14706 Carmack Amendment to the Interstate Commerce Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00593
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hollaway v. Admi Corp. et al
as 2:2024cv01415
Plaintiff:
Michelle A. Hollaway
Defendant:
Admi Corp. Doing business as TAG - The Aspen Group and Aspen Dental Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Feather River Air Quality Mgt. District v. USPS Marysville Post Office et al
as 2:2024cv01406
Plaintiff:
The People of the State of California ex rel. Feather River Air Quality Management District
Defendant:
United States Postal Service Marysville Post Office and Postmaster Fred Stewart
Wool and Oak, Inc. v. Container Number WHSU6916907 et al
as 2:2024cv04164
Plaintiff:
Wool & Oak, Inc.
Defendant:
Container Number WHSU6916907 and DOES 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1701 Shipping/Maritime
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00936
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
