Cases 21 - 30 of 44
The Dan Abrams Company LLC, et al v. Medtronic Inc., et al
as 19-55995
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK DEGGENDORF GMBH, MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC., WARSAW ORTHOPEDIC, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THE DAN ABRAMS COMPANY LLC, Relator
State of Alabama et al v. Endo International PLC, et al
as 3:2019cv04157
Plaintiff:
State of Arkansas, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Defendant:
Endo Pharmaceutical Inc., Endo international PLC. and Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
American Medical Association et al v. Azar et al
as 6:2019cv00318
Defendant:
Alex M. Azar, II, United States Department of Health & Human Services, Office of Population Affairs and others
Plaintiff:
American Medical Association, Michele P. Megregian, C.N.M., Thomas N. Ewing, M.D. and others
Amicus Curiae:
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American College of Physicians, City of Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of Oregon et al v. Azar et al
as 6:2019cv00317
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Defendant:
Alex M. Azar, II, Diane Foley, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Oregon Medical Association, Planned Parenthood of Southwestern Oregon, American Medical Association and others
Amicus Curiae:
New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, Institute for Policy Integrity at New York University School of Law, City of Los Angeles and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Mikkel Jordahl, et al v. Mark Brnovich, et al
as 18-16896
Amicus Curiae:
LAWRENCE GLICKMAN, Professor at Cornell University, 25 ARIZONA LEGISLATORS, GOVERNOR OF ARIZONA, STATE OF KANSAS and others
Defendant:
MATT RYAN, JIM PARKS, in their official capacity as Coconino County Jail District Board of Directors Members, ART BABBOTT and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MIKKEL JORDAHL and MIKKEL (MIK) JORDAHL, PC
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF ARIZONA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, in his official capacity as Arizona Attorney General
United States of America v. State of California et al
as 2:2018cv00490
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
State of California , Edmund Gerald Brown, Jr. and Xavier Becerra
Amicu:
American Center for Law and Justice , State of Texas , State of Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
State of California et al v. Teikoku Seiyaku Co., Ltd. et al
as 3:2018cv00675
Plaintiff:
State of California , State of Alabama , State of Arkansas and others
Defendant:
Teikoku Seiyaku Co., Ltd. and Teikoku Pharma USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
National Association of Wheat Growers et al v. Zeise et al
as 2:2017cv02401
Plaintiff:
Associated Industries of Missouri, Agribusiness Association of Iowa, National Corn Growers Association and others
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra and Lauren Zeise
Amicus Curiae:
State of Iowa, State of Indiana, The National Health Federation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Azael Perales v. FBI, et al
as 17-56213
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AZAEL DYTHIAN PERALES
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Training Academy, National Academy, ALBANY, Counties Covered: Albany, Fulton, Hamilton, Montgomery, Rensselaer, Saratoga, Schenectady, Schoharie, Warren, and Washington, ALBUQUERQUE, Counties Covered: Bernalillo, Catron, Cibola (eastern half Guadalupe, Quay, Sandoval, Soccorro, Torrence and Valencia and others
United States of America et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv05389
Defendant:
Astellas Pharma, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Impax Laboratories, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
District of Columbia, John Radice, State of California and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
