Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 72
Muroff et al v. United States Securities and Exchange Commission et al
as 1:2018cv00133
Plaintiff: Serofim Muroff , Montana State Gold Company, LLC , Idaho State Gold Company II, LLC and others
Defendant: United States Securities and Exchange Commission, Jay Clayton, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Ten Lakes Snowmobile Club, et al v. USFS, et al
as 18-35014
Plaintiff - Appellant: TEN LAKES SNOWMOBILE CLUB, MONTANANS FOR MULTIPLE USE, North Lincoln County Chapter, CITIZENS FOR BALANCED USE and others
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, U.S. FOREST SERVICE, Northern Region, KOOTENAI NATIONAL FOREST and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee: THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY, HEADWATERS MONTANA, IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE and others
Ten Lakes Snowmobile Club, et al v. USFS, et al
as 17-36028
Plaintiff - Appellee: TEN LAKES SNOWMOBILE CLUB, MONTANANS FOR MULTIPLE USE, North Lincoln County Chapter, CITIZENS FOR BALANCED USE and others
Defendant - Appellant: UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, U.S. FOREST SERVICE, Northern Region, KOOTENAI NATIONAL FOREST and others
Intervenor-Defendant: THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY, HEADWATERS MONTANA, IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE and others
DeJong v. Idaho State Board of Medicine
as 1:2017cv00469
Plaintiff: Ann DeJong
Defendant: Idaho State Board of Medicine
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Albert Veenstra, III, et al v. USDC-IDB
as 17-71575
: In re: ALBERT PETE VEENSTRA III, MIGUEL CHARLES JOYNER, JEFFREY BOYD ASH and others
Petitioner: ALBERT PETE VEENSTRA III, MIGUEL CHARLES JOYNER, JEFFREY BOYD ASH and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO, BOISE
Real Party In Interest: IDAHO STATE BOARD OF CORRECTION, Executive Department of the State of Idaho, IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Executive Department of the State of Idaho, DEBBIE FIELD, Appointed member of teh ISBC sued in her official capacity and others
Chen et al v. U.S. Bank National Association et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv01109
Plaintiff: Chi Chen , Shuqin Chen , Bingxin Fan and others
Defendant: U.S. Bank National Association , Quartzburg Gold , ISR Capital and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Mao et al v. US Bank National Association et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv01113
Plaintiff: Rui Mao , Zhen Fan , Wenlan Huang and others
Defendant: US Bank National Association , Quartzburg Gold , ISR Capital and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Ten Lakes Snowmobile Club et al v. United States Forest Service et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2015cv00148
Plaintiff: Ten Lakes Snowmobile Club , Montanans for Multiple Use , Citizens for Balanced Use and others
Defendant: United States Forest Service, U.S. Forest Service, Kootenai National Forest and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Idaho Rivers United et al v. Hudson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00169
Plaintiff: Idaho Rivers United , Morgan Wright and Olga Wright
Defendant: Joe Hudson and United States Forest Service
Intervenor_defendant: Idaho State Board of Land Commissioners and Idaho Department of Lands
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Cancer Fund of America Incorporated et al
as 2:2015cv00884
Defendant: James Reynolds, II, Cancer Fund of America Incorporated a Delaware corporation doing business as Breast Cancer Financial Assistance Fund, Cancer Support Services Incorporated and others
Plaintiff: Federal Trade Commission, Alabama, State of, Alaska, State of and others
Receiver: Receivership Management Incorporated
Petitioner: First Tennessee Bank NA, Associated Community Services Incorporated and Central Processing Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?