Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Johnson v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2779
Plaintiff: CHARLEY JOHNSON, Trustee of the Charley E. Johnson Revocable Living Trust
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, THOMAS J. VILSACK, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Agriculture and others
United States of America, et al. v. United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Eugene, et al.
as 24-684
Petitioner: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHRISTY GOLDFUSS, in her official capacity as Director of Council on Environmental Quality, SHAUN DONOVAN, in his official capacity as Director of the Office of Management and Budget and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, EUGENE
Defendant: STATE OF ALABAMA
Not Classified By Court: XIUHTEZCATL TONATIUH M., through his Guardian Tamara Roske-Martinez, ALEXANDER LOZNAK, JACOB LEBEL and others
Intervenor: THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS, AMERICAN FUEL & PETROCHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
Erdmann-Browning et al v. Vilsack et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv04678
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ANIKA OKJE ERDMANN-BROWNING, Jacqueline Benitez and Anika Okje Erdmann-Browning
Defendant: Thomas J. Vilsack and Shalanda Young
Ducey v. Moore et al
as 2:2022cv01814
Plaintiff: Douglas A Ducey
Defendant: Randy Moore, Camille Calimlim Touton, Thomas J Vilsack and others
Intervenor Defendant: Center for Biological Diversity
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Abdullah et al v. United State of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv04798
Plaintiff: Ali Nasser Abdullah and State Market Liquor
Defendant: United States of America and Thomas J Vilsack
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Zatarah et al v. USA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01474
Plaintiff: Ahmed Yousef Fawakhiri, Amal A. Zatarah and Meadowview Market
Defendant: United States of America and Thomas J. Vilsack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Price Kane, LLC et al v. United States Department of Agriculture et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv03098
Plaintiff: Price Kane, LLC, Price Pasco, LLC, Price Properties, LLC and others
Defendant: United States Department of Agriculture, Thomas J Vilsack and Farm Service Agency of United States Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Daniels Ranch, LLC et al v. Farm Service Agency of United States Department of Agriculture et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv03099
Plaintiff: Daniels Ranch LLC, Super Orchards II LLC, Quincy Ranch LLC and others
Defendant: Farm Service Agency of United States Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture and Thomas J Vilsack
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Oregon Wild et al v. United States Forest Service et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv01007
Plaintiff: Oregon Wild and WildEarth Guardians
Defendant: United States Forest Service, Michael Ramsey, Jeannette Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Community Action Resources Enterprises, Inc., et al v. Thomas Vilsack, et al
as 22-35539
Plaintiff / Appellant: COMMUNITY ACTION RESOURCES ENTERPRISES, INC., an Oregon not-for-profit organization
Plaintiff: LISA MCFALLS, MICHAEL MCFALLS and FRED WOODRING
Defendant / Appellee: THOMAS J. VILSACK, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, JUSTIN MAXSON, Deputy Undersecretary for Rural Development, JOAQUIN ALTORO, Administrator of Rural Housing Service and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?