Cases 121 - 130 of 148
Behrman v. Powell et al
as 2:2011cv00347
Plaintiff:
Bradley G Behrman
Defendant:
Sachia Stonefeld Powell, David Powell, Douglas J Ende and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Silva v. Moore Hotel, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv01973
Plaintiff:
Walter S. Silva
Defendant:
Moore Hotel, Inc., Mike Meagher, Jane Doe Meagher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Matkin v. Reinke et al
as 4:2010cv00574
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Jo Matkin
Defendant:
Brent Reinke, Brian Underwood, Bill C Lloyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mark Wicklund v. Ada County, et al
as 10-35613
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK STEPHEN WICKLUND
Defendant - Appellee:
ADA COUNTY and JOHN/JANE DOE 1-5
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-16000
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Boitz v. Washington County et al
as 6:2010cv00312
Defendant:
Judge Rita Batz-Cobb, John/Jane Doe, Judge Thomas Kohl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wicklund v. Ada County et al
as 1:2009cv00673
Plaintiff:
Mark Stephen Wicklund
Defendant:
Ada County and John/Jane Doe 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ford v. Idaho State Bar et al
as 1:2009cv00640
Plaintiff:
Harold Ford
Defendant:
Idaho State Bar, John & Jane Does 1-10, Client Assistance Fund Committee Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lundborg v. Maui County et al
as 1:2009cv00544
Plaintiff:
Steve Lundborg and Steve Lundborg
Defendant:
Maui County, Thomas Phillips, John/Jane Doe Maui County Police Employees #1-20 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Durrant v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2009cv01644
Plaintiff:
William G Durrant
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Charles L Ryan, Jane Doe Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
