Cases 131 - 140 of 976
McDermott v. Miner et al
as 3:2022cv00104
Plaintiff:
Daniel Josef McDermott
Defendant:
Joel Miner, John Williamson, Ty Coolridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blakeley v. Gunderson et al
as 3:2022cv00035
Plaintiff:
Barry Blakeley
Defendant:
Daniel G. Gunderson, Christopher Rafferty, Timothy Wolff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett et al v. Weldon et al
as 1:2022cv00002
Plaintiff:
Heather Bennett, James Barrett, Amy Breaux and others
Defendant:
Beth Weldon, Michelle Bonnet Hale, Wade Bryson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Clervrain et al v. Brown et al
as 1:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Alex Felix, Woodny Lormil and others
Defendant:
Ann Brown, Craig Campbell, Mike Tauriainen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ludvick v. Reigh et al
as 3:2022cv00036
Petitioner:
Lee J Ludvick
Respondent:
Christina L. Reigh, Christopher S. Lesch, William Vitkus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chipps et al v. Sprenger
as 3:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
Gabrielle Chipps, Holly Chipps and Timothy Chipps
Defendant:
Matthew Sprenger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
McDermott v. Miller et al
as 3:2022cv00046
Plaintiff:
Daniel Josef McDermott
Defendant:
Wayne Miller, Ron Hayes, Quinn Nardini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chipps et al v. Lovell
as 3:2022cv00047
Plaintiff:
Gabrielle Chipps, Holly Chipps and Timothy Chipps
Defendant:
James Lovell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
