Cases 11 - 20 of 106
Holmes-James v. Harding et al
as 4:2022cv07758
Plaintiff:
Geneva Y. Holmes-James
Defendant:
Betty Jean Harding, Keith Broderick Bernard-Sims and Donald Ray Peoples
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sims v. Krammer et al
as 2:2022cv01217
Plaintiff:
Shanna Sims
Defendant:
Daniel Krammer and Samantha Steven
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Scott v. Unknown Parties et al
as 2:2022cv01185
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Unknown Parties, Dale Sims, Will Bobo, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Sims v. City of Seattle et al
as 2:2022cv00483
Plaintiff:
Anthony Sims
Defendant:
City of Seattle, Robert Brown, Gregory Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00885
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00880
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Kyle Petersen v. Anthony Sims, Jr., et al
as 22-15362
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KYLE PETERSEN
Defendant / Appellee:
ANTHONY SIMS, Jr., HSI Agent and NICHOLAS TORRES, HSI Agent
Thomas et al v. Wells Fargo & Company et al
as 3:2022cv01931
Plaintiff:
Winfred Thomas, Sims Michelle and Michelle Sims
Defendant:
Wells Fargo & Company and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
