Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Mattson et al v. Streibel et al
as 1:2022cv00104
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Lacy Mattson and Daniel W Vogt
Defendant:
Aron Streibel and City of Caldwell, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Girard v. Battin et al
as 3:2021cv01137
Plaintiff:
lacy girard
Defendant:
Jason Battin, Colette Peters, Brian Belleque and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019at00848
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01658
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lacy et al v. City of San Francisco et al
as 3:2019cv02662
Defendant:
San Francisco, San Francisco Police Officer Hutchinson # 904, Doe 1-25 and others
Plaintiff:
Denise Lacy, D.G. a minor and D.G.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thomas v. Mitchell et al
as 2:2018cv01615
Defendant:
Scott S. Mitchell, Clark County District Attorney's Office and Clark County, Nevada
Plaintiff:
Lacy L. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MM Holdings LLC et al v. County of Nye et al.
as 2:2018cv00088
Defendant:
County of Nye and L. Darrell Lacy
Plaintiff:
MM Holdings, LLC and Efrain Rene Morales Moreno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Vrooman v. Beaverton City et al
as 3:2017cv01051
Defendant:
Cate Arnold, Lacy Beaty, Beaverton City and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Charles Vrooman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lacy v. Snohomish County et al
as 2:2016cv01551
Plaintiff:
Sara L. Lacy
Defendant:
Snohomish County , Doug Pendergrass , Ty Trenary and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Schultz v. Hill, et al.,
as 2:2015cv02384
Defendant:
Dawn Marie Hill, Tom Loguiduce, Lacy Clair Stevens and others
Plaintiff:
Lee Michael Schultz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
