Cases 11 - 20 of 223
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv07212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
(PS) Halajian v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA et al
as 2:2023cv01522
Plaintiff:
Barry Stuart Halajian
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA, Elizabeth Ostrowski, Hasset & George, PC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05924
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Barbara Stuart Robinson v. State of California
as 2:2023cv04943
Plaintiff:
Barbara Stuart Robinson
Defendant:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Glasco v. Biden et al
as 2:2023cv00202
Plaintiff:
Tyrone C Glasco, Sr.
Defendant:
Joseph R Biden, Barack Obama, Kamala Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thunderfoot et al v. United States et al
as 1:2023cv00006
Defendant:
Clare E. Connors, Josh Green, David Y. Ige and others
Plaintiff:
Thunderfoot, Rainy Day Living Trust, Estate of Brendan Sean Gypkhaim Charlie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shuler v. The Honorable Stuart J. Scott
as 5:2022cv07652
Plaintiff:
Randall Shuler
Defendant:
The Honorable Stuart J. Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Barbara Robinson v. King County
as 22-35808
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BARBARA STUART ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
KING COUNTY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
