Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv03020
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ines v. Home Street Bank et al
as 1:2014cv00542
Plaintiff:
Tom Ines
Defendant:
Home Street Bank, Lina Hwang, Ryan Cooney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. State of Nevada Department of Parole and Probation et al
as 2:2014cv01785
Defendant:
Sgt. P.O. Brown, P.O. Calloway, P.O. Watford and others
Plaintiff:
Charles J. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maye et al v. County of Sonoma et al
as 4:2014cv02841
Plaintiff:
Lynda Maye and L. H.
Defendant:
County of Sonoma, Madeline Sowers, Darcee Drakulich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez et al v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2014cv00613
Plaintiff:
Richard G Martinez and Richard and Gloria Martinez Family Trust
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Maricopa County Superior Court, SCI Arizona Funeral Services Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Dolly Teters v. Borst Automotive Incorporated, et al
as 13-15607
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOLLY G. TETERS
Defendant - Appellee:
BORST AUTOMOTIVE INCORPORATED, CARLA SOTOMAYOR, JAN E. KEARNEY and others
Teters v. Borst Automotive Incorporated et al
as 4:2012cv00536
Plaintiff:
Dolly G Teters
Defendant:
Borst Automotive Incorporated, Carla Sotomayor, Scott MacMillan Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nathaniel Williams v. Yannis, et al
as 12-16177
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHANIEL J. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
YANNIS, Pin 6024, MADISON, Detective Pin 4770 and JOHN PARRIS
Williams v. Yannis et al
as 2:2012cv00194
Defendant:
Madison, John Parris and Officer Yannis
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel J Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv05499
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
