Cases 21 - 30 of 236
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01394
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Heather Blanchard, et al v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 22-55895
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HEATHER BLANCHARD, as guardian ad litem for her minor child I.C.W., successor-in-interest to Joseph Alan Wear
Plaintiff:
DONNELLE WEAR
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, ADRIAN DE CASAS, Deputy Sheriff, JONATHAN PAWLUK, Deputy Sheriff and others
Shannon Clark v. USPS
as 22-55842
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHANNON CLARK
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jin Rie v. USPS, et al
as 22-55733
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JIN RIE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and DOES, 1-10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022at00546
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00888
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Shannon Clark v. USPS
as 22-55584
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHANNON CLARK
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-55467
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Daniel Brewer v. USPS, et al
as 22-35267
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL MCCOOK BREWER
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and LOUIS DEJOY, Postmaster General
Defendant:
FEDERAL OFFICE OF WORKER'S COMPENSATION, U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION and OFFICE OF FEDERAL OPERATION, of E.E.O.C.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
