Civil Rights Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 86
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv00804
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv03106
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv03068
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Schwake v. Arizona Board of Regents et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00696
Plaintiff: David Otto Schwake
Defendant: Arizona Board of Regents, Michael M Crow, Kevin Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Quade v. Arizona Board of Regents et al
as 2:2015cv00610
Plaintiff: Brent Quade
Defendant: Arizona Board of Regents , Michael M Crow , Kevin Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stanley v. Arizona Board of Regents et al
as 2:2015cv00522
Defendant: Arizona Board of Regents , James Rund , Ronald Hicks and others
Plaintiff: Matthew Stanley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Adams et al v. Committee on Judicial Conduct & Disability et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv01046
Plaintiff: John Adams and Shane Castle
Defendant: Committee on Judicial Conduct & Disability and Cathy A. Catterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NOT USED
as 2:2015cv00085
Defendant: C. Martin Company, Inc., John Castle, Neco Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00081
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00087
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?